Throughout the history of scientific research, there has been a divide between experimental study and implementation of policy regarding the significant findings of research. Furthermore, climate change is perpetuating the marginalization of groups of people through the consequential shifts in economic and geopolitical powers. Therefore, it is essential that the scientific community is cognizant about how our findings will potentially impact different sectors of society and particularly vulnerable groups of people. 

Arctic climate change and the shifts in marine ecology consequentially threaten food security- specifically for indigenous communities. The Arctic is a unique case study due to its physical and ecological dynamics including extreme seasonality and low biodiversity, along with the unique geopolitical boundaries and shared impacts of climate change among different stakeholders. There are about 4 million people in the Arctic and about 10% of this population is indigenous. This sets the stage for the importance of respecting local and indigenous Arctic peoples who have a historical dependence on the marine environment. This includes a history of subsistence hunting, fishing, artistic expression, trading, travel and transport, and ceremonies and cultural sites.  

​

As climate change has threatened food security, increased ocean acidification, and decreased the existence of ice bridges for travel in the Arctic, scientists have made attempts at conservation and resource management models. These drastically needed response strategies need to include ecological research, along with developing co-production of knowledge. The synthesis of scientific research, indigenous knowledge, traditional knowledge, and local knowledge is imperative in ensuring that different stakeholders in the Arctic are having their needs and concerns not only heard, but respected and advocated for.